Planning Proposal - (Amendment 66) Rezoning of 146 Newbridge Road, Moorebank (Residential use of Georges Cove Marina) (125 dwellings)

Stage history

1. Withdrawn

   source label: “withdrawn/Withdraw”

   Status date 28 Nov 2020 · Observed 12 June 2026 → current

More in Liverpool City Council

• New Liverpool Local Environmental Plan Post-exhibition· 12 June 2026
• Lot 2 Newbridge Road Moorebank - Council Initiated Planning Proposal Withdrawn· 18 Jan 2026
• Chester Square: 1 Leicester Street, Chester Hill Withdrawn· 17 June 2024
• Liverpool LEP 2008 Amendment 80 - Holsworthy Town Centre (350 homes/150 jobs) Withdrawn· 15 Sept 2021
• Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008 (Amendment 63) - To rezone land at 60-80 Southern Cross Avenue and 45-66 Hall Circuit, Middleton Grange (862 dwellings) Withdrawn· 24 Dec 2020

Planning disputes in Liverpool City Council

Tribunal and court decisions naming this council, newest first. A signal of contested development in the area, not legal advice.

• Sharma v Liverpool City Council [2022] NSWLEC 10 NSWLEC· 16 Feb 2022· Sharma v Liverpool City Council [2022] NSWLEC 10 CRIME — Appeal and review — Appeal from Local Court to Land and Environment Court — By person against conviction — Fail to comply with development control order — Use and internal fit-out of garage for habitable purposes contrary to approval — Construction of carport without consent — Procedural fairness — Appeal conceded by prosecutor — Appeal upheld — Conviction and orders of Local Court set aside
• Liverpool City Council v Tirnova [2020] NSWLEC 110 NSWLEC· 11 Aug 2020· Liverpool City Council v Tirnova [2020] NSWLEC 110 CONTEMPT - orders made in Class 4 proceedings requiring removal of unauthorised development on flood-prone land - orders required removal of masonry front fence (Order (3)) and removal of substantial additions to dwelling house (Order (5)) - three months allowed for compliance with Order (3) and 12 months for compliance with Order (5) - single rolled-up charge laid by Council for non-compliance with Orders (3) and (5) - failure to achieve full compliance with Order (3) within the time allowed by
• King v Liverpool City Council (No.3) [2018] NSWSC 1047 NSWSC· 13 July 2018· King v Liverpool City Council (No.3) [2018] NSWSC 1047 CIVIL PROCEDURE – representative proceedings – personal injury claim – settlement approval – Civil Procedure Act 2005, s 173 – claim unlikely to succeed – no opposition by group members – satisfied that the settlement is in the plaintiff’s interests – settlement approved
• King v Liverpool City Council (No.2) [2018] NSWSC 29 NSWSC· 31 Jan 2018· King v Liverpool City Council (No.2) [2018] NSWSC 29 CIVIL PROCEDURE – case management – vacation of
• King v Liverpool City Council [2017] NSWSC 1148 NSWSC· 24 Aug 2017· King v Liverpool City Council [2017] NSWSC 1148 CIVIL PROCEDURE – security for costs –inherent jurisdiction of the Court – principle of fairness
• Hussain v Liverpool City Council [2014] NSWLEC 45 NSWLEC· 22 Apr 2014· Hussain v Liverpool City Council [2014] NSWLEC 45 PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - motion to set aside order granting the applicant leave to appeal out of time - whether Court had power to grant leave - application for leave to appeal lodged more than three months after date of conviction - s 33(2) of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 - order made irregularly - r 36.15 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 - order set aside APPEAL - severity appeal against sentence in Local Court - application for leave to appeal lodged more than three months