VIC Approved / gazetted CASEY · Exhibited

Introduce a new Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Policy at Clause 22.18 of the Casey Planning Scheme| and Amend Clause 21.10 Natural and Built Assets to provide further policy support for the new policy within the Municipal Strategic Statement (MSS) of the planning scheme. The objectives of the Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Policy are: To provide for the identification protection and management of Aboriginal cultural heritage values. To promote consultation with the local Aboriginal communities in providing for the conservation and enhancement of places sites and objects of Aboriginal cultural heritage value. To ensure new uses development and works do not adversely impact on sites and features of Aboriginal cultural heritage and archaeological significance. The policy requires that (depending on the location of a site) for any development (including subdivision) or rezoning proposal either an Archaeological Survey or Cultural Heritage Assessment would be required to be carried out by the applicant/proponent and to be submitted with a planning application/rezoning submission to Council. Development proposals for extensions to existing buildings would be excluded and single dwellings would also generally be excluded (unless the site is within proximity of the Western Port coastline or other existing or former watercourse or water body). The policy only applies to greenfield sites that have not been substantially disturbed by buildings and works or activities associated with post-European contact.

Status date
15 Feb 2007
Exhibition
·
Gazettal
15 Feb 2007
Outcome
Approved
Amendments tracked
295
Last 12 months
10
Approval rate
88%

How to object or make a submission

Your next step if this rezoning affects you. Submissions are how the decision-maker hears from the community.

  1. 1 Rezonings happen through planning scheme amendments under the Planning and Environment Act 1987. The council exhibits the amendment and invites submissions.
  2. 2 Make a written submission to the council during the exhibition period, stating whether you support or oppose the amendment and why.
  3. 3 If unresolved submissions remain, they are referred to an independent planning panel, where submitters can be heard before the council decides.

General information about the public submission process, not legal advice. Confirm the current process and deadlines with the council or the official source before acting.

Stage history

  1. Approved / gazetted

    source label: “Finished:Approved”

    Status date 15 Feb 2007 · Observed 12 June 2026 → current

More in CASEY

Planning disputes in Casey

Tribunal and court decisions naming this council, newest first. A signal of contested development in the area, not legal advice.

All disputes and stats for this council →

From vic-amendments, fetched 12 June 2026. View at source

Zoning and planning data © State of New South Wales (Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure) and © State of Victoria (Department of Transport and Planning), licensed under CC BY 4.0. Basemap © OpenFreeMap © OpenMapTiles Data © OpenStreetMap contributors. Zoning renders for WA © Western Australian Land Information Authority and TAS © State of Tasmania.

Data sources update daily. State-by-state coverage · How to read the map · Zoning codes by state · Blog · How we compare