Amendment C046 (Casey)
Introduce a new Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Policy at Clause 22.18 of the Casey Planning Scheme| and Amend Clause 21.10 Natural and Built Assets to provide further policy support for the new policy within the Municipal Strategic Statement (MSS) of the planning scheme. The objectives of the Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Policy are: To provide for the identification protection and management of Aboriginal cultural heritage values. To promote consultation with the local Aboriginal communities in providing for the conservation and enhancement of places sites and objects of Aboriginal cultural heritage value. To ensure new uses development and works do not adversely impact on sites and features of Aboriginal cultural heritage and archaeological significance. The policy requires that (depending on the location of a site) for any development (including subdivision) or rezoning proposal either an Archaeological Survey or Cultural Heritage Assessment would be required to be carried out by the applicant/proponent and to be submitted with a planning application/rezoning submission to Council. Development proposals for extensions to existing buildings would be excluded and single dwellings would also generally be excluded (unless the site is within proximity of the Western Port coastline or other existing or former watercourse or water body). The policy only applies to greenfield sites that have not been substantially disturbed by buildings and works or activities associated with post-European contact.
- Status date
- 15 Feb 2007
- Exhibition
- ·
- Gazettal
- 15 Feb 2007
- Outcome
- Approved
Casey
Council profile →- Amendments tracked
- 295
- Last 12 months
- 10
- Approval rate
- 88%
How to object or make a submission
Your next step if this rezoning affects you. Submissions are how the decision-maker hears from the community.
- 1 Rezonings happen through planning scheme amendments under the Planning and Environment Act 1987. The council exhibits the amendment and invites submissions.
- 2 Make a written submission to the council during the exhibition period, stating whether you support or oppose the amendment and why.
- 3 If unresolved submissions remain, they are referred to an independent planning panel, where submitters can be heard before the council decides.
General information about the public submission process, not legal advice. Confirm the current process and deadlines with the council or the official source before acting.
Stage history
-
Approved / gazetted
source label: “Finished:Approved”
Status date 15 Feb 2007 · Observed 12 June 2026 → current
More in CASEY
- Amendment C296case (Casey) Approved / gazetted· 18 June 2026
- Amendment C304case (Casey) Approved / gazetted· 7 May 2026
- Amendment C302case (Casey) Assessment· 7 May 2026
- Amendment C300case (Casey) Post-exhibition· 23 Apr 2026
- Amendment C291case (Casey) Approved / gazetted· 1 Apr 2026
- Amendment C303case (Casey) Approved / gazetted· 1 Apr 2026
Planning disputes in Casey
Tribunal and court decisions naming this council, newest first. A signal of contested development in the area, not legal advice.
- Dasler v Casey CC [2026] VCAT 366 VCAT· 20 May 2026· Dasler v Casey CC [2026] VCAT 366
- Maple Media Pty Ltd v Casey CC [2026] VCAT 71 VCAT· 6 Feb 2026· Maple Media Pty Ltd v Casey CC [2026] VCAT 71
- Taylor v Casey CC [2026] VCAT 10 VCAT· 8 Jan 2026· Taylor v Casey CC [2026] VCAT 10
- Dragic v Casey CC [2025] VCAT 1084 VCAT· 9 Dec 2025· Dragic v Casey CC [2025] VCAT 1084
- Peters v Casey CC [2025] VCAT 848 VCAT· 25 Sept 2025· Peters v Casey CC [2025] VCAT 848
- Singh v Casey CC [2025] VCAT 467 VCAT· 27 May 2025· Singh v Casey CC [2025] VCAT 467