Planning disputes
Every planning and environment court and tribunal decision we track, matched to a council, in one table. Filter by state, posture or who won, search any party, court or keyword, sort any column, and click through to the council or the full public judgment.
State
Posture
Analysis
Won by
Outcome
Filtered to
6,348 decisions on record across 372 councils. Showing the most recent 6,000. Outcome, development type and who won are read from each judgment by an LLM (5,355 analysed so far). Use the enriched view or the won-by filter to see only those; the rest are marked pending and fill in as analysis runs.
Court and tribunal judgments are checked daily. See coverage and live source health.
Showing 1–15 of 15
| Catchwords | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rodney Duarte v Waverley Council [2022] NSWLEC 53 | NSW | Waverley Council | NSWLEC | Dismissed | Other | Council | 9 May 2022 | PROCEDURE: application for expedition – application for injunctive relief – application for removal of indoor ducted air conditioning unit – application for dismissal – legal principles – failure to join all necessary parties to the proceedings – no jurisdiction to determine claims – no reasonable causes of action disclosed – expedition refused – proceedings dismissed. |
| Whitfield v Waverley Council [2015] NSWLEC 207 | NSW | Waverley Council | NSWLEC | Granted | Subdivision | Applicant | 10 Dec 2015 | SUBDIVISION – creation of two units from one – the separation – acoustic impacts – separation of electricity supply |
| SDHA Pty Ltd v Waverley Council [2015] NSWLEC 65 | NSW | Waverley Council | NSWLEC | Dismissed | Mixed use | Council | 24 Apr 2015 | APPEAL: appeal against |
| Waverley Council v Walsh [2014] NSWLEC 195 | NSW | Waverley Council | NSWLEC | Upheld | Single dwelling | Council | 19 Dec 2014 | CIVIL ENFORCEMENT - failure to comply with a s 121B order issued under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 - dilapidated house - risk to human safety - declaratory and remediation orders made - legal costs and repair expenses awarded. |
| Goldberg v Waverley Council [2008] NSWLEC 49 | NSW | Waverley Council | NSWLEC | Granted | Subdivision | Applicant | 3 Mar 2008 | Development Application :- subdivision into two allotments - engineering feasibility of development - visual impact - vehicle and pedestrian access - permissibility of purpose - unlikely to significantly affect the environment - limited visibility for vehicles and pedestrians - public safety |
| Notaras v Waverley Council & Anor [2007] NSWCA 333 | NSW | Waverley Council | NSWCA | Dismissed | — | Council | 26 Nov 2007 | BUILDING CONTROL AND TOWN PLANNING – Environmental planning instruments – Whether Development Control Plans binding on Council - BUILDING CONTROL AND TOWN PLANNING – Consent and approval of councils – Whether Council decision to allow development which exceeds restrictions in Development Control Plans is Wednesbury unreasonable - PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Submissions – Where limited leave granted to submit further submissions on certain points after |
| Goldberg v Waverley Council [2007] NSWLEC 259 | NSW | Waverley Council | NSWLEC | Other | — | — | 25 May 2007 | Jurisdiction :- whether under s 39(2) Land and Environment Court Act 1979 the Court, for the purposes of hearing and disposing of an appeal from a council development refusal, has council’s functions and discretions as roads authority to grant consent for roadwork under s138 Roads Act 1993 and (in relation to that consent) as determining authority under Part 5 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 |
| Waverley Council v Ferreira [2005] NSWCA 418 | NSW | Waverley Council | NSWCA | — | — | — | 1 Dec 2005 | NEGLIGENCE - liability of Council as occupier - claim for mental trauma - death of child occurring in park managed by Council - discussion of factors set out in s 5B of Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) - Council's breaches of duty. - NEGLIGENCE - contributory negligence - whether child aged 12 could perceive the relevant risk - s 5R of the Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW). D |
| Waverley Council v Boris Meck [2005] NSWLEC 655 | NSW | Waverley Council | NSWLEC | Upheld | Dual occupancy | Council | 20 Sept 2005 | Development Consent :- Carrying out development without consent - Existing development consent for an attached dual-occupancy development – Additional work undertaken without approval – Plea of guilty – Mitigating factors |
| Segal & Anor v Waverley Council [2005] NSWCA 310 | NSW | Waverley Council | NSWCA | — | — | — | 15 Sept 2005 | ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING - |
| Molnar v Waverley Council [2005] NSWLEC 308 | NSW | Waverley Council | NSWLEC | Costs | — | Mixed | 9 June 2005 | Costs :- Fair and reasonable costs Application for concurrence by Chief Judge of a Commissioner's costs determination |
| C M Hairis Architects v Waverley Council [2003] NSWLEC 404 | NSW | Waverley Council | NSWLEC | Dismissed | Subdivision | Applicant | 19 Dec 2003 | Appeal :- Section 56A of the Land and Environment Court Act (1979) Whether errors of law disclosed in the Commissioner's |
| Trustees of the Christian Brothers (Waverley College) v Waverley Council [2003] NSWLEC 176 | NSW | Waverley Council | NSWLEC | Interlocutory | Education | Applicant | 15 July 2003 | Appeal :- review of Registrar's decision - not fully appraised of circumstances to vacate |
| WAVERLEY MUNICIPAL COUNCIL v SWAIN [2003] NSWCA 61 | NSW | Waverley Council | NSWCA | — | — | — | 3 Apr 2003 | TORTS - Negligence - Jury trial - Whether verdict against the evidence and against the weight of the evidence - Whether no evidence capable of sustaining verdict - TORTS - Negligence - Liability of statutory authority - Breach of duty of care by failure to erect warning signs and positioning of flags on beach - Where swimmer dived under wave and hit submerged sandbar |
| Waverley Municipal Council v Cheowiry [2003] NSWCA 12 | NSW | Waverley Council | NSWCA | — | — | — | 5 Feb 2003 | Leave to appeal - extension of time - applicant stated would not appeal, then changed its mind - unsatisfactory reason for change of mind - refusing application would not cause injustice to applicant - extension of time refused. |