Planning disputes

Every planning and environment court and tribunal decision we track, matched to a council, in one table. Filter by state, posture or who won, search any party, court or keyword, sort any column, and click through to the council or the full public judgment.

State
Posture
Analysis
Won by
Outcome
Filtered to

6,364 decisions on record across 372 councils. Showing the most recent 6,000. Outcome, development type and who won are read from each judgment by an LLM (5,360 analysed so far). Use the enriched view or the won-by filter to see only those; the rest are marked pending and fill in as analysis runs.

Court and tribunal judgments are checked daily. See coverage and live source health.

Showing 1–1 of 1

National planning disputes
Catchwords
Warren Shire Council v Kuehne & Anor [2012] NSWCA 81NSWWarren Shire CouncilNSWCA———16 Apr 2012TORTS - Appeal - negligence - common law duty of care - s 33 Companion Animals Act 1998 (NSW) - whether local council owed a duty to residents to declare a dog "dangerous" - Stuart v Kirkland-Veenstra - whether a special statutory power - relationship between council and residents created by special statutory power - degree of control exercised by council - vulnerability of those who depend on proper exercise of statutory power. TORTS - Appeal - negligence - breach of duty - whether hunting dogs

Zoning and planning data © State of New South Wales (Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure) and © State of Victoria (Department of Transport and Planning), licensed under CC BY 4.0. Basemap © OpenFreeMap © OpenMapTiles Data © OpenStreetMap contributors. Zoning renders for WA © Western Australian Land Information Authority and TAS © State of Tasmania.

Data sources update daily. State-by-state coverage · How to read the map · Zoning codes by state · Blog · How we compare