Planning disputes
Every planning and environment court and tribunal decision we track, matched to a council, in one table. Filter by state, posture or who won, search any party, court or keyword, sort any column, and click through to the council or the full public judgment.
State
Posture
Analysis
Won by
Outcome
Filtered to
6,355 decisions on record across 372 councils. Showing the most recent 6,000. Outcome, development type and who won are read from each judgment by an LLM (5,357 analysed so far). Use the enriched view or the won-by filter to see only those; the rest are marked pending and fill in as analysis runs.
Court and tribunal judgments are checked daily. See coverage and live source health.
Showing 1–1 of 1
| Catchwords | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Temora Shire Council v Stein [2004] NSWCA 236 | NSW | Temora Shire Council | NSWCA | — | — | — | 21 July 2004 | NEGLIGENCE - tripping case - raised edge of driveway across footpath - obvious in daylight to pedestrian taking reasonable care for own safety - plaintiff tripped at night - evidence of street light across road - no evidence of state of illumination of driveway or that plaintiff could not or did not see it - defendant owed duty of care - correct question whether in breach of duty - action or inaction of reasonable council to be assessed on basis of pedestrians taking reasonable care for own safe |