Planning disputes
Every planning and environment court and tribunal decision we track, matched to a council, in one table. Filter by state, posture or who won, search any party, court or keyword, sort any column, and click through to the council or the full public judgment.
State
Posture
Analysis
Won by
Outcome
Filtered to
6,355 decisions on record across 372 councils. Showing the most recent 6,000. Outcome, development type and who won are read from each judgment by an LLM (5,357 analysed so far). Use the enriched view or the won-by filter to see only those; the rest are marked pending and fill in as analysis runs.
Court and tribunal judgments are checked daily. See coverage and live source health.
Showing 1–12 of 12
| Catchwords | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Charara v Ku-ring-gai Council [2019] NSWLEC 183 | NSW | Ku-Ring-Gai Council | NSWLEC | Other | — | Mixed | 28 Nov 2019 | PROCEDURE – appeal against stop work order in Class 1 proceedings – unilateral assumption of nullity of development consent and invalidity of construction certificates by local council underpinning stop work order – all issues arising should be determined in Class 4 proceedings |
| Palmer v Ku-ring-gai Council [2018] NSWLEC 16 | NSW | Ku-Ring-Gai Council | NSWLEC | Upheld | Single dwelling | Council | 16 Feb 2018 | ORDER APPEAL - appeal against |
| Ku-ring-gai Council v Abroon [2010] NSWLEC 176 | NSW | Ku-Ring-Gai Council | NSWLEC | Interlocutory | Dual occupancy | Applicant | 21 Sept 2010 | PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE :- application to vacate |
| Ku-ring-gai Council v Minister for Planning (No 2) [2008] NSWLEC 276 | NSW | Ku-Ring-Gai Council | NSWLEC | Dismissed | — | Council | 2 Oct 2008 | Costs :- judicial review proceedings in Class 4 of Court's jurisdiction - costs where no hearing of an issue on the merits - whether respondent surrendered to applicant or whether there was a supervening event which removed the subject of the dispute such that there should be no order as to costs - whether on another issue unsuccessful applicant brought proceedings in the public interest such that there should be no order as to costs - whether disentitling conduct by successful respondent such t |
| Ku-ring-gai Council v Minister for Planning & Anor [2008] NSWLEC 174 | NSW | Ku-Ring-Gai Council | NSWLEC | Dismissed | Other | Council | 21 May 2008 | Judicial Review :- Validity of order by Minister for Planning appointing a planning panel under s 118(1)(b) of Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 - whether invalid on any of following grounds - whether failed to take into account a mandatory relevant consideration - whether failed to obtain concurrence of Minister for Local Government as required by s 118(8) - whether invalid because of prior Ministerial direction made under s 55 - whether denial of procedural fairness - whether coun |
| Ku-Ring-Gai Council v Faigan [2007] NSWLEC 767 | NSW | Ku-Ring-Gai Council | NSWLEC | Upheld | Other | Council | 19 Nov 2007 | Civil Enforcement :- whether local government order complied with - exercise of discretion to make order to remove items Civil Enforcement:- whether independent use of front yard for storage and mechanical repairs which required consent under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 |
| Charalambous v Ku-ring-gai Council [2007] NSWLEC 510 | NSW | Ku-Ring-Gai Council | NSWLEC | Dismissed | Dual occupancy | Council | 21 Aug 2007 | Question of Law :- development consent subject to conditions - condition relating to landscape bond - refusal of application to modify consent to delete condition - whether condition falls outside scope of bonds which may lawfully be imposed - newbury test - whether condition is ultra vires - source of power for a consent authority to impose conditions - provision of security - general and specific provisions |
| Shaynd v Ku-ring-Gai Council [2005] NSWLEC 79 | NSW | Ku-Ring-Gai Council | NSWLEC | — | — | — | 24 Jan 2005 | Question of Law :- Preliminary question Whether the Court has the power to approve a development applies where part of the land is land to which subclause (a) of Schedule 3 of SEPP 53 applies. COSTS: fair and reasonable costs - granted |
| Toon v Ku-ring-gai Council (No 2) [2004] NSWLEC 593 | NSW | Ku-Ring-Gai Council | NSWLEC | Costs | Other | Applicant | 5 Oct 2004 | Appeal :- SEPP 5 Development - costs |
| Toon v Ku-ring-gai Council [2004] NSWLEC 173 | NSW | Ku-Ring-Gai Council | NSWLEC | — | — | — | 30 Apr 2004 | Appeal :- SEPP 5 development - effect of draft Local Environment Plan - heritage issues. |
| Hones v Ku-ring-gai Council [2004] NSWLEC 168 | NSW | Ku-Ring-Gai Council | NSWLEC | Other | Dual occupancy | Mixed | 16 Apr 2004 | Question of Law :- preliminary question-whether land that is partly identified as "bushfire prone land-vegetation category 1" is wholly excluded from dual occupancy provisions of SEPP 53 |
| Porfiri v Ku-ring-gai Council [2003] NSWLEC 34 | NSW | Ku-Ring-Gai Council | NSWLEC | Refused | Dual occupancy | Council | 28 Feb 2003 | Development Application :- whether provisions of planning scheme ordinance restricting erection of dwellings affects zoning of land for the purpose of the erection of dual occupancy pursuant to State Environmental Planning Policy No. 53 - inconsistency between State environmental planning policy and local environmental plan. |