Planning disputes

Every planning and environment court and tribunal decision we track, matched to a council, in one table. Filter by state, posture or who won, search any party, court or keyword, sort any column, and click through to the council or the full public judgment.

State
Posture
Analysis
Won by
Outcome
Filtered to

6,348 decisions on record across 372 councils. Showing the most recent 6,000. Outcome, development type and who won are read from each judgment by an LLM (5,355 analysed so far). Use the enriched view or the won-by filter to see only those; the rest are marked pending and fill in as analysis runs.

Court and tribunal judgments are checked daily. See coverage and live source health.

Showing 1–11 of 11

National planning disputes
Catchwords
Hawkesbury City Council v Saed [2022] NSWLEC 34NSWHawkesbury City CouncilNSWLECUpheldOtherCouncil1 Apr 2022ENVIRONMENTAL OFFENCE – removal of trees –charge of development without consent – guilty plea – sentencing principles – substantial actual and likely environmental harm caused by the commission of the offence – state of the mind of the defendant at the time of the commission of the offence – whether defendant was criminally negligent – objective seriousness of the commission of the offence moderate to low – no prior convictions – genuine remorse and contrition demonstrated – specific and general
Hawkesbury Sports Council v Martin [2019] NSWCA 76NSWHawkesbury City CouncilNSWCA———16 Apr 2019TORTS – negligence – breach of duty – where risk of harm obvious – where not established that risk not insignificant – whether content of duty required precaution of removing steel cable EVIDENCE – opinion evidence – expert opinion – where expert “civil engineer” and “building consultant” – where opinion as to human visual perception – whether expert has “specialised knowledge” – whether opinion wholly or substantially based on such specialised knowledge EVIDENCE – photographic evidence – where
Byrnes v Hawkesbury City Council [2015] NSWCA 173NSWHawkesbury City CouncilNSWCA———25 June 2015TORTS – negligence – findings of fact – whether the primary judge erred in concluding that the Council did not perform work at the location of the appellant’s fall and was therefore not responsible for the appellant’s injury – whether the primary judge erred in, alternatively, accepting and declining to accept certain evidence and in not giving sufficient weight to other evidence
Ford v Hawkesbury City Council [2015] NSWLEC 19NSWHawkesbury City CouncilNSWLECDismissedAgriculturalCouncil16 Feb 2015APPEAL – against conviction and severity of sentence – contractor convicted of unlawfully clearing about 12 trees on a rural property – whether defence of honest and reasonable mistake of fact made out – whether fine of $8,000 too severe
Jarvie v Hawkesbury City Council [2013] NSWSC 1636NSWHawkesbury City CouncilNSWSCInterlocutory—Council7 Nov 2013APPEAL FROM LOCAL COURT - notice of discontinuance filed without consent of other party or with leave of the court - other party's consent to discontinuance provided to the court - order as to costs.
Jarvie v Hawkesbury City Council [2013] NSWSC 1341NSWHawkesbury City CouncilNSWSC———17 Sept 2013PROCEDURE - appeal from magistrate - application to strike out appeal for want of prosecution - appeal on grounds of law - delay in obtaining transcript - delay not adequately explained - appeal to proceed on basis of evidence filed to date
Jarvie v Hawkesbury City Council [2009] NSWLEC 220NSWHawkesbury City CouncilNSWLECUpheldOtherCouncil9 Dec 2009PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE :- stay of former bankrupt's application to reinstate his proceedings until he has paid other party's costs of other proceedings.
Thomson v Hawkesbury City Council [2009] NSWLEC 151NSWHawkesbury City CouncilNSWLECDismissed—Council9 Sept 2009APPEAL :- appeal against severity of sentences and costs order - appeal by way of rehearing - fresh evidence on appeal - nature and purpose of award of costs in Local Court - appeal dismissed
Angel v Hawkesbury City Council [2008] NSWCA 130NSWHawkesbury City CouncilNSWCA———25 June 2008NEGLIGENCE – Civil Liability Act 2002 – Duty of care – Pedestrian – Footpath under management of Council defective – Actual knowledge of risk of harm – Whether defect constituted an ‘obvious risk’ to reasonable person in position of appellant – Defect obscured by shadows – Relation between obviousness of risk and breach of duty – Whether appellant took reasonable care for own safety - EVIDENCE – Interpretation of photographs – Lay opinion - DAMAGES – Future gratuitous attendant care services – W
Bruyan, S v Hawkesbury City Council [2006] NSWLEC 51NSWHawkesbury City CouncilNSWLECCostsSubdivisionMixed15 Feb 2006Costs :- class 1 - exercise of discretion in favour of consent authority where applicant fails to submit supporting material within a reasonable time.
Hawkesbury City Council v Jarvie [2005] NSWLEC 775NSWHawkesbury City CouncilNSWLECInterlocutoryExtractiveApplicant5 July 2005Interlocutory Relief :- continuation of injunction - drilling of a test bore - no evidence of irreparable harm - undertaking to carry out the drilling in accordance with the licence conditions - injunction discharged

Zoning and planning data © State of New South Wales (Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure) and © State of Victoria (Department of Transport and Planning), licensed under CC BY 4.0. Basemap © OpenFreeMap © OpenMapTiles Data © OpenStreetMap contributors. Zoning renders for WA © Western Australian Land Information Authority and TAS © State of Tasmania.

Data sources update daily. State-by-state coverage · How to read the map · Zoning codes by state · Blog · How we compare