Planning disputes

Every planning and environment court and tribunal decision we track, matched to a council, in one table. Filter by state, posture or who won, search any party, court or keyword, sort any column, and click through to the council or the full public judgment.

State

Posture

Analysis

Won by

Outcome

Filtered to

6,269 decisions on record across 370 councils. Showing the most recent 6,000. Outcome, development type and who won are read from each judgment by an LLM (5,346 analysed so far). Use the enriched view or the won-by filter to see only those; the rest are marked pending and fill in as analysis runs.

Court and tribunal judgments are checked daily. See coverage and live source health.

Showing 1–3 of 3

National planning disputes
								Catchwords
Regional Express Holdings Limited v Dubbo City Council (No 3) [2014] NSWLEC 87	NSW	Dubbo Regional Council	NSWLEC	—	—	—	26 June 2014	JUDICIAL REVIEW - challenge to local council decision to charge fee for service of passenger security screening at regional airport - whether power to charge entity not receiving the service - statutory requirements for notification of public of intended fee complied with - no failure to accord procedural fairness to applicant - council decisions not irrational or unreasonable - no failure to consider mandatory relevant matters - irrelevant matters not considered
Regional Express Holdings Limited v Dubbo City Council (No 2) [2013] NSWLEC 113	NSW	Dubbo Regional Council	NSWLEC	Interlocutory	Other	Applicant	23 July 2013	JUDICIAL REVIEW - motion under r 59.10 of Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 to extend time to commence judicial review proceedings, to provide reasons for challenged decisions under r 59.9, and to amend summons - whether Part 59 of UCPR applied retrospectively to an earlier administrative decision.
Regional Express Holdings Limited v Dubbo City Council [2013] NSWLEC 110	NSW	Dubbo Regional Council	NSWLEC	Interlocutory	—	—	15 July 2013	PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - application for adjournment of hearing of applicant's notice of motion because applicant had very recently decided to obtain new legal representation.