Planning disputes

Every planning and environment court and tribunal decision we track, matched to a council, in one table. Filter by state, posture or who won, search any party, court or keyword, sort any column, and click through to the council or the full public judgment.

State
Posture
Analysis
Won by
Outcome
Filtered to

6,287 decisions on record across 371 councils. Showing the most recent 6,000. Outcome, development type and who won are read from each judgment by an LLM (5,349 analysed so far). Use the enriched view or the won-by filter to see only those; the rest are marked pending and fill in as analysis runs.

Court and tribunal judgments are checked daily. See coverage and live source health.

Showing 1–1 of 1

National planning disputes
Catchwords
Central Darling Shire Council v Greeney [2015] NSWCA 51NSWCentral Darling Shire CouncilNSWCA———16 Mar 2015TORTS – negligence – duty of care – the respondent was employed by a road maintenance and repair subcontractor of the appellant – the respondent was injured as a result of a direction given by an employee of the appellant – whether the primary judge erred in finding that the appellant owed a duty of care to the respondent – whether the primary judge erred in finding that the appellant was negligent TORTS – negligence – causation – whether the primary judge erred in finding that the appellant’s n

Zoning and planning data © State of New South Wales (Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure) and © State of Victoria (Department of Transport and Planning), licensed under CC BY 4.0. Basemap © OpenFreeMap © OpenMapTiles Data © OpenStreetMap contributors. Zoning renders for WA © Western Australian Land Information Authority and TAS © State of Tasmania.

Data sources update daily. State-by-state coverage · How to read the map · Zoning codes by state · Blog · How we compare