Planning disputes

Every planning and environment court and tribunal decision we track, matched to a council, in one table. Filter by state, posture or who won, search any party, court or keyword, sort any column, and click through to the council or the full public judgment.

State
Posture
Analysis
Won by
Outcome
Filtered to

6,348 decisions on record across 372 councils. Showing the most recent 6,000. Outcome, development type and who won are read from each judgment by an LLM (5,355 analysed so far). Use the enriched view or the won-by filter to see only those; the rest are marked pending and fill in as analysis runs.

Court and tribunal judgments are checked daily. See coverage and live source health.

Showing 1–17 of 17

National planning disputes
Catchwords
Bathurst Regional Council v Natural Resources Access Regulator (No 2) [2022] NSWSC 1113NSWBathurst Regional CouncilNSWSC———23 Aug 2022COSTS – general rule that costs follow the event –discretion to order otherwise – material considerations – proceedings brought by public authorities – issue of public importance – public interest in transparency of regulation – neither party wholly successful – no order as to costs
Bathurst Regional Council v Natural Resources Access Regulator [2022] NSWSC 846NSWBathurst Regional CouncilNSWSCDismissedExtractiveCouncil28 June 2022ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – judicial review of official caution – effect of caution on legal rights – availability of declaration – establishing basis of alleged error ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING – water – water management work approval – interpretation – condition to maintain outflow equal to lesser of inflow or pipe capacity – condition to release percentage of storage conserved in preceding inflow event – determining volume of releases ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING – offences – penalty notice offence – use
Bathurst Regional Council v Department of Planning, Industry and Environment trading as Natural Resources Access Regulator [2021] NSWLEC 109NSWBathurst Regional CouncilNSWLECInterlocutory—Council8 Oct 2021JUDICIAL REVIEW –
Prefabricated Buildings Pty Ltd v Bathurst Regional Council (No 2) [2017] NSWLEC 111NSWBathurst Regional CouncilNSWLEC———30 Aug 2017COSTS – Class 3 application – whether a departure from the presumptive rule that each party bears its costs is warranted – whether it is fair and reasonable in the circumstances to award costs – whether the applicant acted unreasonably – whether the proceedings centred around a question of law
Prefabricated Buildings Pty Ltd v Bathurst Regional Council [2017] NSWLEC 44NSWBathurst Regional CouncilNSWLEC———24 Apr 2017STATUTORY INTERPRETATION – whether Council can charge for services based on availability of services and actual use of services – Local Government Act 1993 (NSW) s 501 and s 502
Adrenaline Pty Ltd v Bathurst Regional Council [2015] NSWCA 123NSWBathurst Regional CouncilNSWCADismissedOtherCouncil11 May 2015APPEALS - notice of contention - whether respondent permitted to raise defences not run at trial - Council not permitted to run defences of causation or change of position - Council permitted to run defence of good consideration - whether question of law which was not fully argued, not determined by primary judge and not necessary to decide should be decided LOCAL GOVERNMENT - power to fix fee for services - whether Council obliged to comply with Chapter 15 Part 10 of Local Government Act 1993 (
Trackcorp Adrenalin Pty Ltd v Bathurst Regional Council (No.3) [2014] NSWSC 690NSWBathurst Regional CouncilNSWSCDismissedTourismCouncil30 May 2014CONTRACT - breach - contract permitting plaintiff to hold motor sport event - exclusivity provision - whether defendant breached provision by allowing other promoters to conduct events substantially similar to plaintiff's event - no breach established EQUITY - remedies - rectification - alleged common intention not established NEGLIGENCE - existence of duty of care - whether duty owed by one contracting party to another to ensure no breach of exclusivity provision - duty not found to exist TRADE
Trackcorp Adrenalin Pty Ltd v Bathurst Regional Council [2013] NSWSC 1699NSWBathurst Regional CouncilNSWSCInterlocutory—Council19 Nov 2013EVIDENCE - client legal privilege - waiver - whether party acted inconsistently with objecting to evidence of instructions given to lawyers - Evidence Act 1995, s 122(2)
Trackcorp Adrenalin Pty Ltd v Bathurst Regional Council (No 2) [2013] NSWSC 1701NSWBathurst Regional CouncilNSWSCInterlocutory—Mixed19 Nov 2013EVIDENCE - client legal privilege - waiver - loss of privilege in legal advice due to voluntary disclosure of substance of advice - whether party acted inconsistently with objecting to evidence of instructions and other documents relating to advice - Evidence Act 1995, s 122(2)
Manning v Bathurst Regional Council (No 2) [2013] NSWLEC 186NSWBathurst Regional CouncilNSWLECUpheld—Applicant31 Oct 2013JUDICIAL REVIEW: whether council under an obligation to notify adjoining property owner of proposed development - whether failure to notify was manifestly unreasonable - whether re-notification of the development an appropriate order under s 25B of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 - whether demolition of the development appropriate.
Bathurst Regional Council as Trustee for the Bathurst City Council Crown Reserves Reserve Trust v Thompson (No 2) [2012] NSWCA 420NSWBathurst Regional CouncilNSWCA———14 Dec 2012COSTS - offer of compromise
Bathurst Regional Council as Trustee for the Bathurst City Council Crown Reserves Reserve Trust v Thompson [2012] NSWCA 340NSWBathurst Regional CouncilNSWCA———26 Oct 2012TORT - negligence - visitor slipping on steps of rotunda in park - park including rotunda property of a trust - Council trustee of trust - relationship between Council and trust not explored at trial - whether s 42 Civil Liability Act 2002 applied to Council as trustee - whether Council could rely upon "principles" in s 42 without calling any evidence - application of s 5B Civil Liability Act 2002 - whether defect in steps reasonably foreseeable by Council - if so what if any was a reasonable re
Bathurst Regional Council v Taylor [2012] NSWLEC 226NSWBathurst Regional CouncilNSWLECDismissedSingle dwellingCouncil4 Oct 2012APPEAL - s 56A of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 - question of law - development application - construction of clause in planning instrument - whether commissioner failed to take into account the policy in clause - whether in imposing development consent conditions which engaged clause commissioner was required but failed to apply clause - no power to grant development consent
Manning v Bathurst Regional Council [2012] NSWLEC 127NSWBathurst Regional CouncilNSWLECInterlocutoryOtherMixed1 June 2012PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE: application for leave to amend summons - consequential vacation of
Bathurst Local Aboriginal Land Council v Minister Administering The Crown Lands Act [2007] NSWLEC 495NSWBathurst Regional CouncilNSWLEC———15 Aug 2007Subpoena :- production of documents - publicly adopted copying fee - disinterested third party - statutory procedure to waive or reduce fee
King, Markwick, Taylor & Ors v Bathurst Regional Council [2006] NSWLEC 505NSWBathurst Regional CouncilNSWLECGrantedSubdivisionApplicant7 Sept 2006Judicial Review :- s 94 contribution conditions - not authorised by contributions plan - modification of development consents to delete s 94 contribution conditions and require roadworks - whether Council was satisfied that proposed modification of minimal environment impact and development as modified substantially the same development - severance
Thorncraft & Anor v Bathurst Regional Council & Anor [2005] NSWLEC 571NSWBathurst Regional CouncilNSWLECDismissedSingle dwellingCouncil14 Sept 2005Development Application :- dwelling house on rural land - minimum allotment area requirement - non-compliance - application of State Environmental Planning Policy No. 1 - Development Standards - undesirable precedent

Zoning and planning data © State of New South Wales (Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure) and © State of Victoria (Department of Transport and Planning), licensed under CC BY 4.0. Basemap © OpenFreeMap © OpenMapTiles Data © OpenStreetMap contributors. Zoning renders for WA © Western Australian Land Information Authority and TAS © State of Tasmania.

Data sources update daily. State-by-state coverage · How to read the map · Zoning codes by state · Blog · How we compare