Amendment C046 (Kingston)
The amendment is required to establish and apply a new heritage planning framework policies and implementation tools for managing the development and enhancement of heritage places in the municipality. The new framework has been prepared to manage future development pressures of Councils heritage places and to increase awareness of heritage protection and conservation within the community. Makes changes to the Schedule to the Heritage Overlay and the Planning Scheme maps in order to implement the Heritage Overlay controls to properties identified. Consequently the amendment seeks to amend Clause 61 to introduce 3 new planning scheme maps. Provides heritage protection for places that Council considers warrant inclusion within the Schedule to the Heritage Study as identified by the Heritage Study as significant| Provides a consistent approach to heritage protection across the municipality through the modification of Kingstons Municipal Strategic Statement and the introduction of new planning scheme provisions within Clause 21 and 22 of the Planning Scheme in reference to key issues that may arise pertaining to the protection and enhancement of Councils heritage assets. Includes the Kingston Heritage Study Stages 1 and 2 and the draft Heritage Victoria Guidelines for development 2000 as Reference Documents.
- Status date
- 3 July 2006
- Exhibition
- ·
- Gazettal
- ·
- Outcome
- SplitParent
Kingston
Council profile →- Amendments tracked
- 172
- Last 12 months
- 5
- Approval rate
- 91%
How to object or make a submission
Your next step if this rezoning affects you. Submissions are how the decision-maker hears from the community.
- 1 Rezonings happen through planning scheme amendments under the Planning and Environment Act 1987. The council exhibits the amendment and invites submissions.
- 2 Make a written submission to the council during the exhibition period, stating whether you support or oppose the amendment and why.
- 3 If unresolved submissions remain, they are referred to an independent planning panel, where submitters can be heard before the council decides.
General information about the public submission process, not legal advice. Confirm the current process and deadlines with the council or the official source before acting.
Stage history
-
Withdrawn
source label: “Finished:SplitParent”
Status date 3 July 2006 · Observed 12 June 2026 → current
More in KINGSTON
- Amendment C227king (Kingston) Approved / gazetted· 18 June 2026
- Amendment C228king (Kingston) Approved / gazetted· 13 Nov 2025
- Amendment C229king (Kingston) Approved / gazetted· 15 Oct 2025
- Amendment C225king (Kingston) Approved / gazetted· 27 Aug 2025
- Amendment C226king (Kingston) Approved / gazetted· 13 Aug 2025
- Amendment C221king (Kingston) Approved / gazetted· 2 Apr 2025
Planning disputes in Kingston
Tribunal and court decisions naming this council, newest first. A signal of contested development in the area, not legal advice.
- Exton v Kingston CC [2026] VCAT 328 VCAT· 11 May 2026· Exton v Kingston CC [2026] VCAT 328
- Christian v Kingston CC [2026] VCAT 317 VCAT· 5 May 2026· Christian v Kingston CC [2026] VCAT 317
- Kingston CC v Lantrak Developments Pty Ltd [2026] VCAT 207 VCAT· 27 Mar 2026· Kingston CC v Lantrak Developments Pty Ltd [2026] VCAT 207 Costs
- Mentone Bayside Corporation Pty Ltd v Kingston CC [2026] VCAT 192 VCAT· 23 Mar 2026· Mentone Bayside Corporation Pty Ltd v Kingston CC [2026] VCAT 192
- 53A Nepean Apartments Pty Ltd v Kingston CC [2026] VCAT 171 VCAT· 12 Mar 2026· 53A Nepean Apartments Pty Ltd v Kingston CC [2026] VCAT 171
- DF Project Development Pty Ltd v Kingston CC [2026] VCAT 130 VCAT· 24 Feb 2026· DF Project Development Pty Ltd v Kingston CC [2026] VCAT 130