WEE JASPER FISHERMEN'S SHACKS - HERITAGE LISTING IN THE Yass Valley LEP 2013 - Amendment No. 19
- Status date
- 16 Oct 2024
- Exhibition
- ·
- Gazettal
- ·
- Outcome
- Rejected
Yass Valley Council
Council profile →- Amendments tracked
- 2
- Last 12 months
- 1
- DAs / yr
- 296
- Approval rate
- 50%
How to object or make a submission
Your next step if this rezoning affects you. Submissions are how the decision-maker hears from the community.
- 1 Rezonings (planning proposals) are placed on public exhibition by the council or the NSW Department of Planning. Anyone can make a submission during that window.
- 2 Lodge your submission with the council, or through the NSW Planning Portal where the proposal is exhibited there. State your address, whether you support or object, and your reasons.
- 3 Submissions are public and are reported to the decision-maker. Focus on planning grounds: amenity, traffic, overshadowing, density, heritage and local character.
General information about the public submission process, not legal advice. Confirm the current process and deadlines with the council or the official source before acting.
Stage history
-
Withdrawn
source label: “withdrawn/Not Proceeding”
Status date 16 Oct 2024 · Observed 12 June 2026 → current
More in Yass Valley Council
Planning disputes in Yass Valley Council
Tribunal and court decisions naming this council, newest first. A signal of contested development in the area, not legal advice.
- Lachlan Haskins v Yass Valley Council [2026] NSWLEC 14 NSWLEC· 19 Feb 2026· Lachlan Haskins v Yass Valley Council [2026] NSWLEC 14 PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE — whether Class 1 appeal filed out of time — whether Council had power to determine review under Division 8.2 of the EPA Act — whether period in s 8.3(2)(a) of the EPA Act had expired — whether there was a changed determination within the meaning of s 8.4 of the EPA Act even though original refusal was upheld — whether review determination was a decision subject to appeal within the meaning of s 8.6 of the EPA Act COSTS — r 3.7 of the Land and Environment Court Rules 2007
- Elimatta Pty Ltd v Read and Anor [2021] NSWLEC 75 NSWLEC· 13 July 2021· Elimatta Pty Ltd v Read and Anor [2021] NSWLEC 75 ADMINISTRATIVE LAW — Ground of review other than procedural fairness — Decision contrary to law — Statutory construction — Irrelevant and relevant considerations — Whether decision-maker formed the required states of satisfaction ADMINISTRATIVE LAW — Procedural fairness — Consideration of objection to development application
- Alexander v Yass Valley Council [2011] NSWLEC 148 NSWLEC· 1 Sept 2011· Alexander v Yass Valley Council [2011] NSWLEC 148 JUDICIAL REVIEW - whether apprehension of bias established where conflict of interest in council exercising functions under Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 in relation to land owned by it - whether failure to properly consider heritage issues
- Funtime Investments Pty Limited v Yass Valley Council [2004] NSWLEC 322 NSWLEC· 22 Oct 2004· Funtime Investments Pty Limited v Yass Valley Council [2004] NSWLEC 322 Costs :- Concurrence of Chief Judge with Commissioner's decision Court mechanisms intended to facilitate efficient disposition of planning appeals Fair and reasonable costs to compensate adversely affected party