UNSW West - Anzac Parade, Kensington
- Status date
- 1 Mar 2026
- Exhibition
- ·
- Gazettal
- ·
- Outcome
- Rejected
Randwick City Council
Council profile →- Amendments tracked
- 5
- Last 12 months
- 3
- DAs / yr
- 755
- Approval rate
- 50%
How to object or make a submission
Your next step if this rezoning affects you. Submissions are how the decision-maker hears from the community.
- 1 Rezonings (planning proposals) are placed on public exhibition by the council or the NSW Department of Planning. Anyone can make a submission during that window.
- 2 Lodge your submission with the council, or through the NSW Planning Portal where the proposal is exhibited there. State your address, whether you support or object, and your reasons.
- 3 Submissions are public and are reported to the decision-maker. Focus on planning grounds: amenity, traffic, overshadowing, density, heritage and local character.
General information about the public submission process, not legal advice. Confirm the current process and deadlines with the council or the official source before acting.
Stage history
-
Withdrawn
source label: “withdrawn/Not Proceeding”
Status date 1 Mar 2026 · Observed 12 June 2026 → current
More in Randwick City Council
Planning disputes in Randwick City Council
Tribunal and court decisions naming this council, newest first. A signal of contested development in the area, not legal advice.
- Drake v Randwick City Council [2021] NSWLEC 97 NSWLEC· 16 Sept 2021· Drake v Randwick City Council [2021] NSWLEC 97 COSTS - Class 1 strata subdivision appeal - strata subdivision appeal contingent on successful outcome in Class 1 dual occupancy (attached) development appeal - development appeal unsuccessful - strata subdivision appeal necessarily dismissed as a consequence - Respondent applies for costs of day of strata subdivision appeal addressing jurisdictional issues - no determination of jurisdictional issues - inappropriate to conduct hypothetical determination of jurisdictional issues in strata subdivi
- Kelly v Randwick City Council [2019] NSWLEC 43 NSWLEC· 5 Apr 2019· Kelly v Randwick City Council [2019] NSWLEC 43 COSTS - Class 1 merit appeal - application by successful party for a costs order - “fair and reasonable” test in the Land and Environment Court Rules 2007 - matters in favour of a costs order balanced by matters weighing against such an order - costs order refused - costs ordinarily follow the event on costs applications - whether purported Calderbank offer provided basis to award costs of costs application on an indemnity basis - no basis to depart from award of costs on an ordinary basis - Res
- Woolworths Limited v Randwick City Council [2017] NSWCA 179 NSWCA· 25 July 2017· Woolworths Limited v Randwick City Council [2017] NSWCA 179 DEVELOPMENT – proposed development of existing building for shop – precondition to grant of consent to development of shop – whether building designed or constructed for purpose of “commercial premises” – “commercial premises” includes “retail premises” – misdirection to ask whether current use of building is for registered club – misdirection to ask whether registered club can be “commercial premises” – whether building designed or constructed for “retail premises” – misdirection to require ret
- Wiedeman v Randwick City Council [2013] NSWLEC 159 NSWLEC· 27 Sept 2013· Wiedeman v Randwick City Council [2013] NSWLEC 159 ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - judicial review - apprehended bias - use of neighbourhood park for junior sports authorised by a development consent and temporary licence under s 108 of the Crown Lands Act 1989 - application to modify consent made under s 96 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 - Council only authority able to determine the application - principle of necessity - application for modification assessed by external independent consultant - assessment of comparable park use by
- Defence Housing Australia v Randwick City Council [2013] NSWLEC 59 NSWLEC· 8 May 2013· Defence Housing Australia v Randwick City Council [2013] NSWLEC 59 Appeal - appeal under s 56A Land and Environment Court Act - exercise of discretion to allow appellant to raise legal argument contrary to agreed position at first instance - development application not a Crown development application as defined in the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 - matter remitted to Commissioners for consideration of merits if any such issues remain
- Randwick Racecourse Drive-in Cinema Pty Ltd v Randwick City Council [2010] NSWLEC 134 NSWLEC· 29 June 2010· Randwick Racecourse Drive-in Cinema Pty Ltd v Randwick City Council [2010] NSWLEC 134 PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE :- expedition of proceedings