Rezone Lot 2 DP 1160080 Kialla Road, Crookwell from SP2 to E3 Environmental Management and reduce minimum lot size
- Status date
- 9 Dec 2021
- Exhibition
- ·
- Gazettal
- ·
- Outcome
- ·
Upper Lachlan Shire Council
Council profile →- Amendments tracked
- 1
- Last 12 months
- 0
- DAs / yr
- 109
How to object or make a submission
Your next step if this rezoning affects you. Submissions are how the decision-maker hears from the community.
- 1 Rezonings (planning proposals) are placed on public exhibition by the council or the NSW Department of Planning. Anyone can make a submission during that window.
- 2 Lodge your submission with the council, or through the NSW Planning Portal where the proposal is exhibited there. State your address, whether you support or object, and your reasons.
- 3 Submissions are public and are reported to the decision-maker. Focus on planning grounds: amenity, traffic, overshadowing, density, heritage and local character.
General information about the public submission process, not legal advice. Confirm the current process and deadlines with the council or the official source before acting.
Stage history
-
Withdrawn
source label: “withdrawn/Not Proceeding”
Status date 9 Dec 2021 · Observed 12 June 2026 → current
Planning disputes in Upper Lachlan Shire Council
Tribunal and court decisions naming this council, newest first. A signal of contested development in the area, not legal advice.
- Chamberlain v Kiloren Pty Ltd (Costs of Motion) [2026] NSWSC 643 NSWSC· 4 June 2026· Chamberlain v Kiloren Pty Ltd (Costs of Motion) [2026] NSWSC 643 COSTS — interlocutory application — motion for gross sum costs order dismissed — whether costs should be costs in the cause — whether dismissal or motion constituted “event” for costs purposes — application of rr 42.1 and 42.7 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) — no basis for costs in the cause
- Chamberlain v Kiloren Pty Ltd (Gross Sum Costs Order) [2026] NSWSC 494 NSWSC· 11 May 2026· Chamberlain v Kiloren Pty Ltd (Gross Sum Costs Order) [2026] NSWSC 494 COSTS — gross sum costs order — interlocutory cost orders — whether material enabled fair assessment of gross sum — requirement for logical, fair and reasonable basis for quantification — generic invoice narrations — insufficient explanation of allocation of costs to orders — motion dismissed
- Chamberlain v Kiloren Pty Ltd [2026] NSWSC 451 NSWSC· 24 Apr 2026· Chamberlain v Kiloren Pty Ltd [2026] NSWSC 451 LAND LAW – Public roads – dedication and acceptance prior to 1920 – acts of acceptance by the general public – alternative claim for access as a personal equity – whether the deposited plan showed an intention to dedicate land as a public road – whether acceptance by the general public is to be inferred – circumstances in which the court will make a declaration
- Knox Farms Pty Limited v Upper Lachlan Shire Council [2023] NSWSC 1601 NSWSC· 15 Dec 2023· Knox Farms Pty Limited v Upper Lachlan Shire Council [2023] NSWSC 1601 COSTS — Party/Party — Costs thrown away by reason of amendment of pleadings — Whether costs of whole proceedings to date of the amendment should be ordered COSTS — Party/Party — Where no hearing on the merits — Where claims against particular party discontinued — Whether effective discontinuance of claims against other parties — Whether capitulation on dismissed cross-claim and notice of motion
- Tutzing Pty Ltd v Upper Lachlan Shire Council [2021] NSWSC 1221 NSWSC· 24 Sept 2021· Tutzing Pty Ltd v Upper Lachlan Shire Council [2021] NSWSC 1221 PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – parties – joinder – proceedings for specific performance of a Deed – application by third parties to become defendants – whether applicants are necessary parties to the proceedings – order sought by plaintiff would require defendant Council to proceed to close a public road that adjoins land owned by applicants – held that applicants would be directly affected by orders sought by the plaintiff – applicants held to be necessary parties to the proceedings – application for
- Upper Lachlan Shire Council v Rodgers [2012] NSWCA 259 NSWCA· 23 Aug 2012· Upper Lachlan Shire Council v Rodgers [2012] NSWCA 259 NEGLIGENCE - duty of care - breach - inadequate lighting in car park - car park user tripped on log in darkness en route to vehicle - reasonable requirement for car park operator to take precautions - no contributory negligence NEGLIGENCE - damages - past domestic assistance - sufficient evidence to justify conclusion of 1-2 hours per day of gratuitous care