Proposal to change minimum lot size of Part Lot 17 DP 1196235, Gundy Road Scone from 4 hectares to 1 hectare
- Status date
- 2 May 2022
- Exhibition
- ·
- Gazettal
- ·
- Outcome
- ·
Upper Hunter Shire Council
Council profile →- Amendments tracked
- 3
- Last 12 months
- 0
- DAs / yr
- 178
- Approval rate
- 100%
How to object or make a submission
Your next step if this rezoning affects you. Submissions are how the decision-maker hears from the community.
- 1 Rezonings (planning proposals) are placed on public exhibition by the council or the NSW Department of Planning. Anyone can make a submission during that window.
- 2 Lodge your submission with the council, or through the NSW Planning Portal where the proposal is exhibited there. State your address, whether you support or object, and your reasons.
- 3 Submissions are public and are reported to the decision-maker. Focus on planning grounds: amenity, traffic, overshadowing, density, heritage and local character.
General information about the public submission process, not legal advice. Confirm the current process and deadlines with the council or the official source before acting.
Stage history
-
Withdrawn
source label: “withdrawn/Not Proceeding”
Status date 2 May 2022 · Observed 12 June 2026 → current
More in Upper Hunter Shire Council
Planning disputes in Upper Hunter Shire Council
Tribunal and court decisions naming this council, newest first. A signal of contested development in the area, not legal advice.
- David Casson trading as Casson Planning & Development Services v Upper Hunter Shire Council (No 2) [2017] NSWLEC 149 NSWLEC· 13 Nov 2017· David Casson trading as Casson Planning & Development Services v Upper Hunter Shire Council (No 2) [2017] NSWLEC 149 APPEAL - proposed subdivision - proposal to subdivide an undersized rural allotment into two allotments - alleged errors of law by Commissioner - Commissioner concluded that two provisions of a local environmental plan (LEP) were not available to permit approval of the subdivision - Commissioner further considered that, if one of the provisions of the LEP was available, as a matter of discretion, its provisions were not satisfied - case run
- Darley Australia Pty Ltd v Walfertan Processors Pty Ltd [2012] NSWCA 48 NSWCA· 22 Mar 2012· Darley Australia Pty Ltd v Walfertan Processors Pty Ltd [2012] NSWCA 48 LOCAL GOVERNMENT - building control - development application - principles - whether application in respect of "designated development" - Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW), s 77A - identification of "existing or approved development" - Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000 (NSW) Sch 3, Pt 2, cl 35 APPEAL - appeal from Land and Environment Court - whether order or decision on question of law - where decision required formation of opinion appeal available if deci
- Walfertan Processors Pty Limited v Upper Hunter Shire Council & Ors (No 4) [2010] NSWLEC 108 NSWLEC· 31 Aug 2010· Walfertan Processors Pty Limited v Upper Hunter Shire Council & Ors (No 4) [2010] NSWLEC 108 APPEAL :- section 56A appeal of commissioners' decision in class 1 proceedings - whether commissioners erred in considering environmental impacts of alterations and additions to existing effluent disposal system from tannery to determine if not designated development by virtue of cl 35 Sch 3 of EP&A Regulation - whether failure to consider intensification of existing use provisions of EP&A Act in relation to tannery - whether errors of fact can be raised as questions of law - whether issue not r
- Walfertan Processors Pty Limited v Upper Hunter Shire Council & Ors (No 5) [2010] NSWLEC 109 NSWLEC· 31 Aug 2010· Walfertan Processors Pty Limited v Upper Hunter Shire Council & Ors (No 5) [2010] NSWLEC 109 COSTS :- whether fair and reasonable to order costs be paid in class 1 proceedings in exercise of court's discretion - consideration of court rule on costs in class 1 proceedings - whether either party acted unreasonably - whether applicant failed to bring forward information necessary to enable consideration of its development application - need to consider overall circumstances of litigation in determining how discretion ought be exercised
- Newcastle & Hunter Valley Speleological Society Inc v Upper Hunter Shire Council and Stoneco Pty Limited (No 2) [2010] NSWLEC 104 NSWLEC· 23 June 2010· Newcastle & Hunter Valley Speleological Society Inc v Upper Hunter Shire Council and Stoneco Pty Limited (No 2) [2010] NSWLEC 104 APPEAL :- objector appeal against Council's decision to grant consent to limestone quarry - conditions of consent
- Newcastle & Hunter Valley Speleological Society Inc v Upper Hunter Shire Council and Stoneco Pty Limited [2010] NSWLEC 48 NSWLEC· 31 Mar 2010· Newcastle & Hunter Valley Speleological Society Inc v Upper Hunter Shire Council and Stoneco Pty Limited [2010] NSWLEC 48 APPEAL :- objector appeal against Council’s decision to grant consent to limestone quarry – whether species impact statement (‘SIS’) required - whether endangered ecological community (‘EEC’) present on project site - whether vulnerable species listed under Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995 present on project site – whether likely significant impact on EEC or listed vulnerable species - no likely significant impact on EEC or vulnerable species – no SIS required - uncertainty as to presenc