PP018 Rezone the former Forestry site - 72-74 Maitland Street, Muswellbrook
- Status date
- 29 Oct 2021
- Exhibition
- ·
- Gazettal
- ·
- Outcome
- ·
Muswellbrook Shire Council
Council profile →- Amendments tracked
- 6
- Last 12 months
- 1
- DAs / yr
- 153
- Approval rate
- 100%
How to object or make a submission
Your next step if this rezoning affects you. Submissions are how the decision-maker hears from the community.
- 1 Rezonings (planning proposals) are placed on public exhibition by the council or the NSW Department of Planning. Anyone can make a submission during that window.
- 2 Lodge your submission with the council, or through the NSW Planning Portal where the proposal is exhibited there. State your address, whether you support or object, and your reasons.
- 3 Submissions are public and are reported to the decision-maker. Focus on planning grounds: amenity, traffic, overshadowing, density, heritage and local character.
General information about the public submission process, not legal advice. Confirm the current process and deadlines with the council or the official source before acting.
Stage history
-
Withdrawn
source label: “withdrawn/Withdraw”
Status date 29 Oct 2021 · Observed 12 June 2026 → current
More in Muswellbrook Shire Council
- Schedule an additional permitted use at 893 Paterson Rd, Woodville Assessment· 28 Apr 2026
- Additional Permitted Uses (Stage 1) - Bayswater Power Station Withdrawn· 1 Apr 2025
- Muswellbrook Local Environmental Plan 2009 - New Shire Wide LEP Withdrawn· 28 Feb 2022
- Muswellbrook Bypass Realignment Withdrawn· 24 Nov 2021
- Amendment 13 Muswellbrook LEP 2009 - Woodlands Ridge Extension Withdrawn· 30 Jan 2021
Planning disputes in Muswellbrook Shire Council
Tribunal and court decisions naming this council, newest first. A signal of contested development in the area, not legal advice.
- CWO Pty Ltd v Muswellbrook Shire Council [2024] NSWLEC 61 NSWLEC· 24 June 2024· CWO Pty Ltd v Muswellbrook Shire Council [2024] NSWLEC 61 ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING – Class 1 appeal – appeal against the deemed refusal of amended development application seeking change of use of land – suitability of site – s 4.15(1)(c) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 – risk to safety of users of site posed by Commonwealth explosive ordnance facility not sufficient for site to be deemed unsuitable – “likely impacts” of development – s 4.15(1)(b) of the EP&A Act – impact of site on Commonwealth facility not made out – application
- Mangoola Coal Operations Pty Ltd v Muswellbrook Shire Council [2023] NSWCA 275 NSWCA· 21 Nov 2023· Mangoola Coal Operations Pty Ltd v Muswellbrook Shire Council [2023] NSWCA 275 LIMITATION OF ACTIONS – overpaid rates – no claim made within 12 month limitation period imposed by Recovery of Imposts Act 1963 (NSW), s 2(1) – whether ratepayer’s claim was claim to recover tax “recoverable on restitutionary grounds” – whether claims “recoverable on restitutionary grounds” confined to claims at common law as opposed to statutory claims – significance of extrinsic materials to construction of statute – whether claim for credit as opposed to refund of overpaid rates was a claim
- Mangoola Coal Operations Pty Ltd v Muswellbrook Shire Council [2023] NSWSC 262 NSWSC· 27 Mar 2023· Mangoola Coal Operations Pty Ltd v Muswellbrook Shire Council [2023] NSWSC 262 LIMITATION OF ACTIONS – statute limiting recovery of rates paid to Council – Recovery of Imposts Act 1963 (NSW), s 2(1) – limitation period 12 months from date of payment – whether s 2(1) disapplied – challenge to validity of impost, but no recovery claimed under Local Government Act – whether Local Government Act allowed a claim for recovery of overpayment – whether different limitation period specified LOCAL GOVERNMENT – rates and charges – challenge to Council’s categorisation of land as “min
- Mangoola Coal Operations Pty Ltd v Muswellbrook Shire Council (No 2) [2022] NSWLEC 129 NSWLEC· 7 Nov 2022· Mangoola Coal Operations Pty Ltd v Muswellbrook Shire Council (No 2) [2022] NSWLEC 129 COSTS ‑ Respondent classifies two assessment parcels of land as “coal mine” for rating purposes ‑ two assessment parcels of land owned by applicant coal mine ‑ reclassification sought as “farmland” for two rating years ‑ held both assessment parcels correctly classified as “coal mine” in both assessment years ‑ appeal concerning classification of larger assessment parcel ‑ no appeal concerning classification of smaller assessment parcel as “coal mine” ‑ appeal successful concerning larger assess
- Mangoola Coal Operations Pty Limited v Muswellbrook Shire Council [2021] NSWCA 46 NSWCA· 25 Mar 2021· Mangoola Coal Operations Pty Limited v Muswellbrook Shire Council [2021] NSWCA 46 LOCAL GOVERNMENT – powers, functions and duties – rates and charges – categorisation of land for rating purposes – re-categorisation by Council of farmland to mining land – relevance of impact of ongoing drought on cattle grazing – hiatus in activity on land different to abandonment – activity in rating years required to be considered in its context including what occurred previously on the land and what intended to occur after LOCAL GOVERNMENT – powers, functions and duties – rates and charges
- Mangoola Coal Operations Pty Ltd v Muswellbrook Shire Council [2020] NSWLEC 66 NSWLEC· 11 June 2020· Mangoola Coal Operations Pty Ltd v Muswellbrook Shire Council [2020] NSWLEC 66 RATING CATEGORISATION - categorisation of two assessment parcels - decisions by Council categorising lands as “mining” - applications for review of categorisation seeking to change category to “farmland” - applications covering 2016/17 and 2017/18 rating years - applications for review not determined by Council - appeals against deemed refusals by Council STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION- Valuer General aggregated both assessment parcels pursuant to s 26 of the Valuation of Land Act 1916 - impermissible t