The Oaks North (12 dwellings)
- Status date
- 2 Feb 2021
- Exhibition
- ·
- Gazettal
- ·
- Outcome
- ·
Wollondilly Shire Council
Council profile →- Amendments tracked
- 13
- Last 12 months
- 1
- DAs / yr
- 1,244
- Approval rate
- 67%
How to object or make a submission
Your next step if this rezoning affects you. Submissions are how the decision-maker hears from the community.
- 1 Rezonings (planning proposals) are placed on public exhibition by the council or the NSW Department of Planning. Anyone can make a submission during that window.
- 2 Lodge your submission with the council, or through the NSW Planning Portal where the proposal is exhibited there. State your address, whether you support or object, and your reasons.
- 3 Submissions are public and are reported to the decision-maker. Focus on planning grounds: amenity, traffic, overshadowing, density, heritage and local character.
General information about the public submission process, not legal advice. Confirm the current process and deadlines with the council or the official source before acting.
Stage history
-
Withdrawn
source label: “withdrawn/Withdraw”
Status date 2 Feb 2021 · Observed 12 June 2026 → current
More in Wollondilly Shire Council
- Wilton Industrial Park Assessment· 19 May 2026
- Planning Proposal - Proposed Amendments to WLEP 2011 (Encouraging Horticulture in Rural Zones) Assessment· 7 Apr 2025
- 2 Jarvisfield Road, Picton Seniors Living Planning Proposal Withdrawn· 24 May 2022
- Land Adjoining Oakdale Sportfields (150 dwellings) Withdrawn· 2 Feb 2021
- Land Adjoining Bargo Sportsground (Kader Street), Bargo (22 dwellings) Withdrawn· 2 Feb 2021
- Burragorang and Steveys Forest Roads, Oakdale (30 dwellings. 0 jobs) Withdrawn· 2 Feb 2021
Planning disputes in Wollondilly Shire Council
Tribunal and court decisions naming this council, newest first. A signal of contested development in the area, not legal advice.
- Siobhan Bromley v Wollondilly Shire Council [2026] NSWLEC 130 NSWLEC· 19 Oct 2026· Siobhan Bromley v Wollondilly Shire Council [2026] NSWLEC 130 INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS – stay of development control order – stop use order – use of premises as a recreation facility (indoor) not in accordance with development consent – appeal against order – stay of order until after section 34 conciliation conference
- Godfrey v Wollondilly Shire Council [2026] NSWCA 181 NSWCA· 7 Sept 2026· Godfrey v Wollondilly Shire Council [2026] NSWCA 181 ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING – development consents to carry out different developments on rural land – construction of consents – nature and extent of developments approved – leave to adduce further evidence to construe a consent – carrying out of development in breach of consents – injunctions to restrain breach of consents – how conditions of consent may themselves be breached – whether terms of injunctions too broad and imprecise
- Wollondilly Shire Council v Khoder (No 2) [2025] NSWLEC 53 NSWLEC· 2 June 2025· Wollondilly Shire Council v Khoder (No 2) [2025] NSWLEC 53 SENTENCE – civil contempt – failure to comply with court orders – guilty plea – wilful contempt – capacity to pay a fine – fine imposed
- Muscat Developments Pty Ltd v Wollondilly Shire Council [2023] NSWLEC 121 NSWLEC· 9 Nov 2023· Muscat Developments Pty Ltd v Wollondilly Shire Council [2023] NSWLEC 121 APPEAL – question of law – Commissioner’s decision to refuse consent to remediation works – misconstruction of applicable statutory instrument – misdirection by consideration of non-applicable statute – no error of law in wrong findings of fact.
- Cavanagh v Wollondilly Shire Council (No 2) [2019] NSWLEC 181 NSWLEC· 22 Nov 2019· Cavanagh v Wollondilly Shire Council (No 2) [2019] NSWLEC 181 SEPARATE QUESTION – whether proposed development prohibited under cl 4.1B of the Wollondilly Local Environmental Plan 2011 – proper construction of cl 4.1B – development permissible
- Cavanagh v Wollondilly Shire Council [2019] NSWLEC 105 NSWLEC· 24 July 2019· Cavanagh v Wollondilly Shire Council [2019] NSWLEC 105 CIVIL PROCEDURE: application for the determination of a separate question of law – question if resolved in favour of the council is entirely dispositive of the proceedings – delay in applying for the separate question – proceedings set down for two day hearing – substantial savings in terms of experts’ costs and legal fees if separate question resolved in favour of council – application granted.