Former Corrimal Coke Works
- Status date
- 15 July 2021
- Exhibition
- ·
- Gazettal
- ·
- Outcome
- ·
Wollongong City Council
Council profile →- Amendments tracked
- 11
- Last 12 months
- 4
- DAs / yr
- 1,158
- Approval rate
- 100%
How to object or make a submission
Your next step if this rezoning affects you. Submissions are how the decision-maker hears from the community.
- 1 Rezonings (planning proposals) are placed on public exhibition by the council or the NSW Department of Planning. Anyone can make a submission during that window.
- 2 Lodge your submission with the council, or through the NSW Planning Portal where the proposal is exhibited there. State your address, whether you support or object, and your reasons.
- 3 Submissions are public and are reported to the decision-maker. Focus on planning grounds: amenity, traffic, overshadowing, density, heritage and local character.
General information about the public submission process, not legal advice. Confirm the current process and deadlines with the council or the official source before acting.
Stage history
-
Withdrawn
source label: “withdrawn/Withdraw”
Status date 15 July 2021 · Observed 12 June 2026 → current
More in Wollongong City Council
- Wollongong City Centre On exhibition· 3 June 2026
- Wollongong Health Precinct Lodged· 24 Feb 2026
- Wollongong LEP 2009 - Minor Clause Amendments Post-exhibition· 9 Feb 2026
- Port Kembla Land Transformation Precinct Assessment· 11 Dec 2025
- Gwynneville Planning Proposal Post-exhibition· 28 Apr 2025
- 3-13 Short Street, and 312-324 Princes Highway, Corrimal, and 15 Short Street Corrimal Withdrawn· 20 Mar 2022
Planning disputes in Wollongong City Council
Tribunal and court decisions naming this council, newest first. A signal of contested development in the area, not legal advice.
- Wollongong City Council v McDonald’s Australia Limited [2022] NSWLEC 121 NSWLEC· 5 Oct 2022· Wollongong City Council v McDonald’s Australia Limited [2022] NSWLEC 121 APPEAL - appeal pursuant to s 56A of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 - Commissioner approves a new McDonald’s restaurant at Wongawilli - appeal on questions of law - Council presses three grounds of appeal - Ground 1, Council complains that Commissioner misconstrued or misapplied applicable provisions of the Council's development control plan - Commissioner’s decision demonstrates appropriate and sufficient consideration of applicable provisions of the development control plan - Ground 1
- Wollongong City Council v Williams [2021] NSWCA 140 NSWCA· 9 July 2021· Wollongong City Council v Williams [2021] NSWCA 140 TORTS — Negligence — Appellant injured as a result of falling on the first step on a stepped path in a park — Whether the primary judge erred in finding that the appellant had breached the duty of care which it owed to the respondent — Primary judge found the respondent to be a witness of credit who maintained that he was taking care and was not distracted —Experts agreed that single steps presented a hazard — Primary judge was not in error in finding that the appellant failed to take reasonable
- Wollongong City Council v Papadopoulos [2019] NSWCA 178 NSWCA· 19 July 2019· Wollongong City Council v Papadopoulos [2019] NSWCA 178 DAMAGES – breach of contract – calculation of economic loss – respondent operated kiosk on premises licensed from appellant – appellant breached licence agreement – no evidence of damages – primary judge used ATO “benchmarks” for restaurant businesses to derive likely lost profits – whether primary judge could take judicial notice of benchmarks – whether benchmarks capable of sustaining damages calculated by primary judge – whether nominal damages should be awarded or the matter remitted TRIAL –
- Wollongong City Council v Hollis (No 2) [2017] NSWLEC 176 NSWLEC· 12 Dec 2017· Wollongong City Council v Hollis (No 2) [2017] NSWLEC 176 SENTENCE – contempt of court – failure to obey terms of consent orders – Charge 1 relating to timetable for removal of building and other materials in consent orders – partial failure to remove building and other materials – materials not for use for approved dwelling on the site – consent orders required removal of materials from three nominated areas on the site – material removed from one area – two remaining areas designated Area 4 and Area 7 – some progress with compliance between contempt
- Wollongong City Council v Hollis [2017] NSWLEC 123 NSWLEC· 25 Sept 2017· Wollongong City Council v Hollis [2017] NSWLEC 123 CONTEMPT – two charges laid by Council for alleged breaches of court orders made by consent in Class 4 proceedings – not guilty pleas entered to each charge CONTEMPT – Charge 1 – failure to remove building materials and other materials from the site within the period required by the court orders – some materials removed from site – other materials moved and restacked but remaining on site – Respondent guilty of contempt with respect to Charge 1 CONTEMPT – Charge 2 – failure, within the period re
- Wollongong City Council v K and M Prodanovski Pty Limited [2012] NSWLEC 107 NSWLEC· 11 May 2012· Wollongong City Council v K and M Prodanovski Pty Limited [2012] NSWLEC 107 DEVELOPMENT CONSENT: Construction and interpretation of development consents and conditions - commencement and lapsing of consents - reliance on work done in breach of consent - work "related to" the development in the consent - costs