Amendment 16 Newcastle LEP 2012 - Planning controls for land affected by a Local Government Area boundary adjustment - Newcastle and Lake Macquarie
- Status date
- 30 Jan 2021
- Exhibition
- ·
- Gazettal
- ·
- Outcome
- ·
Newcastle City Council
Council profile →- Amendments tracked
- 1
- Last 12 months
- 0
- DAs / yr
- 1,484
How to object or make a submission
Your next step if this rezoning affects you. Submissions are how the decision-maker hears from the community.
- 1 Rezonings (planning proposals) are placed on public exhibition by the council or the NSW Department of Planning. Anyone can make a submission during that window.
- 2 Lodge your submission with the council, or through the NSW Planning Portal where the proposal is exhibited there. State your address, whether you support or object, and your reasons.
- 3 Submissions are public and are reported to the decision-maker. Focus on planning grounds: amenity, traffic, overshadowing, density, heritage and local character.
General information about the public submission process, not legal advice. Confirm the current process and deadlines with the council or the official source before acting.
Stage history
-
Withdrawn
source label: “withdrawn/Withdraw”
Status date 30 Jan 2021 · Observed 12 June 2026 → current
Planning disputes in Newcastle City Council
Tribunal and court decisions naming this council, newest first. A signal of contested development in the area, not legal advice.
- Partington v Newcastle City Council [2014] NSWSC 1315 NSWSC· 2 June 2014· Partington v Newcastle City Council [2014] NSWSC 1315
- Partington v Newcastle City Council [2014] NSWSC 352 NSWSC· 26 Feb 2014· Partington v Newcastle City Council [2014] NSWSC 352 PROCEDURE - civil - interlocutory relief; application for - relief sought for council to remove barricade erected around a caravan and for access to be provided to plaintiff to effect repair and maintenance work on caravan - no prima facie basis disclosed by plaintiff for relief - no arguable case based on purported oral agreement for plaintiff to have access to park to undertake repairs and removal of caravan during specified period - balance of convenience does not favour grant of relief.
- Newcastle Muslim Association Incorporated v Newcastle City Council [2012] NSWLEC 20 NSWLEC· 17 Feb 2012· Newcastle Muslim Association Incorporated v Newcastle City Council [2012] NSWLEC 20 EXPERT EVIDENCE:- whether leave should be granted to the parties to a Class 1 development refusal appeal to provide copies of expert reports to objectors who wish to consider them for the purposes of their objections to the amended proposal - implied undertaking of a party not to use documents provided by the other party under compulsion of the Court other than for the purposes of the proceedings until received in evidence except with the leave of the Court - whether provision of expert reports
- Save Our Figs Inc v General Manager Newcastle City Council [2011] NSWLEC 207 NSWLEC· 17 Nov 2011· Save Our Figs Inc v General Manager Newcastle City Council [2011] NSWLEC 207 INJUNCTIONS:-whether interlocutory injunction should be granted that respondents not cause destruction or removal of certain trees - whether serious question to be tried - whether general manager of council, when discharging function under s 335(1) Local Government Act, was bound to consider an offer by Premier - meaning of obligation to consider - whether balance of convenience favours grant of interlocutory injunction.
- Aldi Stores v Newcastle City Council [2010] NSWLEC 227 NSWLEC· 3 Nov 2010· Aldi Stores v Newcastle City Council [2010] NSWLEC 227 APPEAL :- appeal pursuant to s 56A - whether there was a mischaracterisation of the use of the proposed development as both a "shop" and a "local shop" - whether there was a denial of procedural fairness - appeal upheld - whether the proceedings should be remitted or whether the consent should be granted - consent granted
- Newcastle City Council v Wescombe [2009] NSWCA 265 NSWCA· 24 July 2009· Newcastle City Council v Wescombe [2009] NSWCA 265 PROCEDURE - costs- appeals as to costs- leave required- applicant Council sought to reverse costs orders made against it in Land and Environment Court- Class 4 proceedings in Land and Environment Court brought by Council had been partly settled and otherwise dismissed- application of UCPR- Calderbank letter- leave to appeal refused. - PROCEDURE - costs- jurisdiction- courts of limited jurisdiction.