49-51 Molong Road - Reclassification
- Status date
- 24 Sept 2025
- Exhibition
- ·
- Gazettal
- ·
- Outcome
- ·
Orange City Council
Council profile →- Amendments tracked
- 6
- Last 12 months
- 2
- DAs / yr
- 412
- Approval rate
- 100%
How to object or make a submission
Your next step if this rezoning affects you. Submissions are how the decision-maker hears from the community.
- 1 Rezonings (planning proposals) are placed on public exhibition by the council or the NSW Department of Planning. Anyone can make a submission during that window.
- 2 Lodge your submission with the council, or through the NSW Planning Portal where the proposal is exhibited there. State your address, whether you support or object, and your reasons.
- 3 Submissions are public and are reported to the decision-maker. Focus on planning grounds: amenity, traffic, overshadowing, density, heritage and local character.
General information about the public submission process, not legal advice. Confirm the current process and deadlines with the council or the official source before acting.
Stage history
-
Withdrawn
source label: “withdrawn/Withdraw”
Status date 24 Sept 2025 · Observed 12 June 2026 → current
More in Orange City Council
- 49-51 Molong Road Reclassifcation Assessment· 19 Feb 2026
- Amendment 26 to Orange LEP 2011 to facilitate retail development at 1517 Forest Road- Alteration of Gateway determination Withdrawn· 8 June 2021
- WITHDRAWN -Orange LEP 2011 - Amendment 15 - Increase HOB from 12m to 20m at 194 Anson Street, Orange Withdrawn· 28 Nov 2020
- WITHDRAWN - Orange LEP 2011 Amendment 11 - Orange Airport Withdrawn· 28 Nov 2020
- Anita Motel Site Redevelopment - Orange Withdrawn· 28 Nov 2020
Planning disputes in Orange City Council
Tribunal and court decisions naming this council, newest first. A signal of contested development in the area, not legal advice.
- Orange City Council v Willis [2026] NSWCA 51 NSWCA· 14 Apr 2026· Orange City Council v Willis [2026] NSWCA 51 APPEALS — appeal from findings of fact — whether the primary judge erred in finding the Council had actual knowledge of the risk which caused the harm — whether knowledge of particular class of Council persons required – whether the primary judge erred in failing to find the liability arose from road works for the purpose of s 45 of the Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) — whether the primary judge erred in failing to find that the claim relied on the exercise of a special statutory power for the pu
- Kudrynski v Orange City Council [2024] NSWCA 33 NSWCA· 22 Feb 2024· Kudrynski v Orange City Council [2024] NSWCA 33 APPEALS – s 57(1) Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (NSW) – requirement for appeal to be from an order or decision on a question of law – deficiencies in the notice of appeal – whether any of the 24 grounds met this requirement COMPULSORY ACQUISITION – Compensation – vacant land acquired by local council for public purpose of stormwater harvesting project – highest and best use of land for rural residential development – appellants sought $160 million compensation below and on appeal
- Kudrynski v Orange City Council [2023] NSWLEC 9 NSWLEC· 17 Feb 2023· Kudrynski v Orange City Council [2023] NSWLEC 9 COMPULSORY ACQUISITION: flood prone vacant land acquired by the council for the public purpose of stormwater harvesting project – land constrained by easements and affected by traffic noise – highest and best use of the land is for rural-residential development – limited comparable sales evidence – adoption of hypothetical development approach –application of statutory disregard – claim that stormwater harvesting project either unfeasible or illegal irrelevant to proceedings – limited weight pla
- Hewatt Pty Ltd v Orange City Council [2020] NSWSC 1662 NSWSC· 23 Nov 2020· Hewatt Pty Ltd v Orange City Council [2020] NSWSC 1662 CIVIL PROCEDURE – separate question – whether there should be a separate determination of the merits of the plaintiff’s claim under the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION – whether by reason of s 16(4) of the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act the defendant would not be able to bring a cross claim against the plaintiff
- Australian Childcare Solutions v Orange City Council [2018] NSWLEC 93 NSWLEC· 20 June 2018· Australian Childcare Solutions v Orange City Council [2018] NSWLEC 93 APPEAL – appeal against Commissioner’s decision on questions of law – refusal of development consent for childcare centre – whether Commissioner misdirected herself and asked the wrong question in construing provisions of development control plan – whether Commissioner substituted her own test for the test in development control plan – Commissioner did not err on question of law in construing and applying development control plan
- Nessdee Pty Limited v Orange City Council (No 2) [2017] NSWLEC 182 NSWLEC· 19 Dec 2017· Nessdee Pty Limited v Orange City Council (No 2) [2017] NSWLEC 182 APPEAL – heliport – amendment of development application – order for payment of costs thrown away – appeal upheld – development consent granted on conditions