34-46 Brookhollow Ave, Norwest - Increase HOB, FSR, include residential flat building as an APU

Stage history

1. Withdrawn

   source label: “withdrawn/Not Proceeding”

   Status date 25 July 2025 · Observed 12 June 2026 → current

More in City of Parramatta Council

• 31 O'Connell Street and 9 Albert Street, North Parramatta Post-exhibition· 5 June 2026
• Fitzwilliam St, Parramatta Assessment· 5 June 2026
• Planning Proposal for land at 90-94 Phillip Street, Parramatta. Assessment· 30 May 2026
• Parramatta Road Corridor Urban Transformation Strategy (PRCUTS) – Stage 2 Lodged· 24 May 2026
• Westmead South Planning Proposal Withdrawn· 16 Oct 2025
• 23-27 HAROLD STREET, PARRAMATTA Withdrawn· 5 Aug 2025

Planning disputes in City of Parramatta Council

Tribunal and court decisions naming this council, newest first. A signal of contested development in the area, not legal advice.

• City of Parramatta Council v Transport for NSW [2026] NSWSC 294 NSWSC· 31 Mar 2026· City of Parramatta Council v Transport for NSW [2026] NSWSC 294 ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – whether reviewable error of law – jurisdictional fact – whether existence of a registered interest in land in a jurisdictional fact – whether a registered planning agreement is a legal interest in land
• Darley v City of Parramatta Council [2025] NSWSC 990 NSWSC· 29 Aug 2025· Darley v City of Parramatta Council [2025] NSWSC 990 ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – local government – judicial review – complaint about councillor – Local Government Act 1993 (NSW) – Council’s Code of Conduct and applicable administrative procedures – construction of Act, Code and procedures – whether conduct reviewer and investigator adhered to the Code and procedures – whether complaints co-ordinator acted contrary to the Code and procedures – whether complaints co-ordinator exceeded authority – whether general manager adhered to requirements of Act – wh
• City of Parramatta Council v Sydney Metro [2024] NSWLEC 23 NSWLEC· 21 Mar 2024· City of Parramatta Council v Sydney Metro [2024] NSWLEC 23 LAND LAW — Compulsory acquisition — Compensation — Assessment of amount payable — Market value — Adjoining owner premium — Special value — Disturbance
• Chatterton v City of Parramatta Council [2022] NSWSC 1603 NSWSC· 23 Nov 2022· Chatterton v City of Parramatta Council [2022] NSWSC 1603 LAND LAW – statutory modification of easements – where two rights of way granted in 1922 to provide access to public road – where character of land changed from rural land to suburbia – where dominant tenements are now a reserve owned by Council and subdivided lots – where pedestrian use continues – where obstacles on right of way and long period of non-use by motor vehicles and other modes of transportation – whether easement allows users to go to, from and across land – whether continued exist
• City of Parramatta Council v Sydney Trees Excavation and Demolition Pty Ltd [2021] NSWLEC 71 NSWLEC· 7 July 2021· City of Parramatta Council v Sydney Trees Excavation and Demolition Pty Ltd [2021] NSWLEC 71 ENVIRONMENTAL OFFENCES: defendant convicted of three offences of breaching the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 – guilty pleas – sentencing principles – extent of environmental harm caused by the commission of the offences – state of mind of offender at the time of the commission of the offences – objective seriousness of the commission of the tree removal offences moderate – objective seriousness of the commission of the tree protection offence low – no prior convictions – remorse
• City of Parramatta Council v Grand Epping Pty Ltd [2021] NSWLEC 70 NSWLEC· 2 July 2021· City of Parramatta Council v Grand Epping Pty Ltd [2021] NSWLEC 70 ENVIRONMENTAL OFFENCES: defendant convicted of two offences of aiding, abetting, counselling, or procuring breaches of s 4.2(1)(b) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 – guilty plea – sentencing principles – extent of environmental harm caused by the commission of the offences – state of mind of offender at the time of the commission of the offences – objective seriousness of the commission of the tree removal offence moderate to high – objective seriousness of the commission of